Ich denke, Sie sollten Ihre child_id in node umbenennen, Ihre parent_id in child_of. Ihre Spaltenbenennung ist etwas verwirrend
create table stack_overflow
(
node int, child_of int
);
insert into stack_overflow(node, child_of) values
(1,0),
(2,1),
(3,2),
(4,2),
(5,3),
(6,4),
(7,0),
(8,7),
(9,8),
(10,1);
Dies funktioniert auf jedem CTE-fähigen RDBMS :
with find_parent(parent, child_of, recentness) as
(
select node, child_of, 0
from stack_overflow
where node = 9
union all
select i.node, i.child_of, fp.recentness + 1
from stack_overflow i
join find_parent fp on i.node = fp.child_of
)
select top 1 parent from find_parent
order by recentness desc
Ausgabe:
parent
7
[EDIT:flexibler und zukunftssicherer] :
with find_parent(node_group, parent, child_of, recentness) as
(
select node, node, child_of, 0
from stack_overflow
where node in (5,9)
union all
select fp.node_group, i.node, i.child_of, fp.recentness + 1
from stack_overflow i
join find_parent fp on i.node = fp.child_of
)
select q.node_group as to_find, parent as found
from find_parent q
join
(
select node_group, max(recentness) as answer
from find_parent
group by node_group
) as ans on q.node_group = ans.node_group and q.recentness = ans.answer
order by to_find
Ausgabe:
to_find found
5 1
9 7
Wenn Sie Postgres verwenden , könnte der obige Code verkürzt werden zu:
with recursive find_parent(node_group, parent, child_of, recentness) as
(
select node, node, child_of, 0
from stack_overflow
where node in (5,9)
union all
select fp.node_group, i.node, i.child_of, fp.recentness + 1
from stack_overflow i
join find_parent fp on i.node = fp.child_of
)
select distinct on (node_group) node_group as to_find, parent as found
from find_parent
order by to_find, recentness desc
DISTINCT AUF Felsen! :-)
