Wie @CraigRinger sagte, hätte ich auch die Analyse überprüfen sollen. In der Tat sehen wir aus "explain analyze", dass die erste lautet:
Aggregate (cost=58406.66..58406.67 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=138191.294..138191.295 rows=1 loops=1)
CTE subq
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on atlas_sezioni2 a (cost=9.93..51052.46 rows=20900 width=236211) (actual time=2.814..308.667 rows=3705 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (ace = 1)
Filter: ((pro_com = 15146::numeric) AND ((code)::text = ANY ('{11100,11210,11220,11230,11240,11300,12100,14200}'::text[])))
Rows Removed by Filter: 4
Heap Blocks: exact=42
-> Bitmap Index Scan on atlas_sezioni2_ace_idx (cost=0.00..9.88 rows=251 width=0) (actual time=0.110..0.110 rows=251 loops=1)
Index Cond: (ace = 1)
SubPlan 1
-> Limit (cost=240.70..240.74 rows=15 width=236190) (actual time=0.630..0.636 rows=15 loops=247)
-> Sort (cost=240.70..240.87 rows=69 width=236190) (actual time=0.627..0.630 rows=15 loops=247)
Sort Key: ((a.geom <-> v.geom))
Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 26kB
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on atlas_sezioni2 v (cost=4.56..239.01 rows=69 width=236190) (actual time=0.045..0.518 rows=73 loops=247)
Recheck Cond: ((code)::text = '12230'::text)
Filter: (((a.code)::text <> (code)::text) AND (a.pro_com = pro_com))
Heap Blocks: exact=6916
-> Bitmap Index Scan on atlas_sezioni2_code_idx (cost=0.00..4.55 rows=73 width=0) (actual time=0.030..0.030 rows=73 loops=247)
Index Cond: ((code)::text = '12230'::text)
-> Unique (cost=7247.20..7351.70 rows=200 width=72) (actual time=138190.527..138191.243 rows=247 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=7247.20..7299.45 rows=20900 width=72) (actual time=138190.526..138190.800 rows=3705 loops=1)
Sort Key: subq.n, (_st_distance(geography(subq.g1), geography(subq.g2), 0::double precision, false))
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 270kB
-> CTE Scan on subq (cost=0.00..5747.50 rows=20900 width=72) (actual time=159.739..138182.891 rows=3705 loops=1)
Planning time: 2.623 ms
Execution time: 138217.574 ms
(27 rows)
während die Unterabfrage eins ist:
Aggregate (cost=6387362.91..6387362.92 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=140208.005..140208.005 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Unique (cost=6386997.16..6387101.66 rows=20900 width=236230) (actual time=140207.243..140207.947 rows=247 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=6386997.16..6387049.41 rows=20900 width=236230) (actual time=140207.241..140207.514 rows=3705 loops=1)
Sort Key: subq.n, (_st_distance(geography(subq.g1), geography(subq.g2), 0::double precision, false))
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 270kB
-> Subquery Scan on subq (cost=9.93..56590.96 rows=20900 width=236230) (actual time=160.784..140199.364 rows=3705 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on atlas_sezioni2 a (cost=9.93..51052.46 rows=20900 width=236211) (actual time=2.384..308.517 rows=3705 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (ace = 1)
Filter: ((pro_com = 15146::numeric) AND ((code)::text = ANY ('{11100,11210,11220,11230,11240,11300,12100,14200}'::text[])))
Rows Removed by Filter: 4
Heap Blocks: exact=42
-> Bitmap Index Scan on atlas_sezioni2_ace_idx (cost=0.00..9.88 rows=251 width=0) (actual time=0.150..0.150 rows=251 loops=1)
Index Cond: (ace = 1)
SubPlan 1
-> Limit (cost=240.70..240.74 rows=15 width=236190) (actual time=0.640..0.646 rows=15 loops=247)
-> Sort (cost=240.70..240.87 rows=69 width=236190) (actual time=0.637..0.640 rows=15 loops=247)
Sort Key: ((a.geom <-> v.geom))
Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 26kB
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on atlas_sezioni2 v (cost=4.56..239.01 rows=69 width=236190) (actual time=0.045..0.527 rows=73 loops=247)
Recheck Cond: ((code)::text = '12230'::text)
Filter: (((a.code)::text <> (code)::text) AND (a.pro_com = pro_com))
Heap Blocks: exact=6916
-> Bitmap Index Scan on atlas_sezioni2_code_idx (cost=0.00..4.55 rows=73 width=0) (actual time=0.031..0.031 rows=73 loops=247)
Index Cond: ((code)::text = '12230'::text)
Planning time: 1.117 ms
Execution time: 140208.187 ms
Es funktioniert also nur in der Erklärung besser :). Die tatsächliche Leistung ändert sich nicht.
