Laut My Oracle Support scheint dies ein erwartetes Verhalten zu sein Dokument-ID 2060374.1. Aber nach ein wenig Experimentieren scheint es, dass das Platzieren des Namensraums in Ihrem XPath dies verhindert; Also:
<patent>{$m/*:patent/@*}
{
for $i in $m/*:patent/*
return $i
}
</patent>'
Mit Ihren Originaldaten (in 11.2.0.4) und serialisiert, um sie besser lesbar zu formatieren:
WITH tmpTable AS (
SELECT * FROM XML_DOCUMENT_TMP cm )
SELECT tt.xml_data ,
XMLSerialize(DOCUMENT
XMLQuery('declare default element namespace "http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip";
declare namespace tsip="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip";
declare namespace tsxm="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsxm";
let $patsLus := $m/patent/*
return
<patent>{$m/*:patent/@*}
{
for $i in $m/*:patent/*
return $i
}
</patent>'
PASSING tt.xml_data as "m" RETURNING CONTENT)
AS VARCHAR2(4000) INDENT SIZE = 2) ewXml
FROM tmpTable tt
WHERE tt.document_id in (1);
XML_DATA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEWXML
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<patent xmlns="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" xmlns:tsip="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" xmlns:tsxm="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsxm" tsip:action="replace" tsip:cc="CA" tsip:se="2715340" tsi
p:ki="C">
<accessions tsip:action="replace">
<accession tsip:src="wila" tsip:type="key">CA-2715340-C</accession>
<accession tsip:src="tscm" tsip:type="tscmKey">CA-2715340-C-20150804</accession>
</accessions>
<claimed tsip:action="replace">
<claimsTsxm tsip:lang="en">
<tsxm:heading tsxm:align="left">We Claim:</tsxm:heading>
<claimTsxm tsip:no="1" tsxm:num="1" tsip:type="main">1. power.</claimTsxm>
</claimsTsxm>
</claimed>
</patent>
<patent xmlns="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" xmlns:tsip="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" tsip:action="replace" tsip:cc="CA" tsip:se="2715340" tsip:ki="C">
<accessions xmlns="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" xmlns:tsip="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" tsip:action="replace">
<accession tsip:src="wila" tsip:type="key">CA-2715340-C</accession>
<accession tsip:src="tscm" tsip:type="tscmKey">CA-2715340-C-20150804</accession>
</accessions>
<claimed xmlns="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" xmlns:tsip="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsip" tsip:action="replace">
<claimsTsxm tsip:lang="en">
<tsxm:heading xmlns:tsxm="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsxm" tsxm:align="left">We Claim:</tsxm:heading>
<claimTsxm tsip:no="1" xmlns:tsxm="http://schemas.thomson.com/ts/20041221/tsxm" tsxm:num="1" tsip:type="main">1. power.</claimTsxm>
</claimsTsxm>
</claimed>
</patent>
Das ist nicht identisch mit Ihrem Original, hat aber keine Namespace-Korruption mehr. Ob Sie das in Ihrer echten Abfrage tun können und ob die Wildcards dabei Probleme verursachen, ist eine andere Sache ...
